The delegated act adopted on 13 July looked like housekeeping. Soluble coffee was added to Annex I of the EU Deforestation Regulation. Cattle leather, retreaded tyres and soybeans for sowing came out. Newly added products get until 30 December 2027, a year after the main deadline.
The act is now with Parliament and the Council for scrutiny. Two months, extendable by two more. Either can veto it. Neither can amend it. So the list is adopted, not final. Housekeeping is the wrong word. Of everything the regulation covers, soluble coffee sits furthest from what a due diligence statement asks for.
Blending is NOT a shortcut. It is the product.
Instant coffee is a blend by design. A commercial soluble product is built to hit a consistent cup profile at a target cost, at scale. That means multiple origins. It means heavy use of robusta. It means reformulating as relative prices move. Buyers procure to specification and volume. Identity of lot is not one of the specifications.
Vietnam sits at the centre of this. Around 95% of its output is robusta, the backbone of the global instant and commercial blend market. It is grown across an estimated 640,000 farms. Smallholders account for 80 to 90% of robusta output in the Central Highlands.
Indonesia is starker. On the national statistics agency’s own classification, smallholders produced 99.6% of coffee output in 2024. Two decades ago it was 95.5%.
Put that together. The plots behind one soluble production batch can number in the thousands. Across several countries. Often on holdings of a hectare or two. Aggregated through collectors before they reach an exporter. Ask a soluble manufacturer which plots went into last month’s production run. The honest answer today is a list of countries and a purchasing spec.
What the rules actually say about mixing
You will often hear that the EUDR bans mass balance. That is close, but not right, and the difference matters commercially. What the Commission’s guidance and FAQ rule out is narrower: mass balance chains of custody that cannot prevent mixing with commodities of unknown origin or with non-compliant material.
Where that bites, it bites hard. One plot in a mixed batch deforested after the cut-off makes the whole batch non-compliant. Partial traceability does not buy partial compliance. But there is a permitted mechanism worth knowing. It is called declaration in excess.
Where a bulk commodity is fully traceable to plot level, and has not been mixed with untraceable or non-compliant material, an operator can declare more plots than a specific consignment actually drew on. ISEAL looked at how this is being used in coffee, palm oil and rubber. It found the mechanism enables controlled mass balance approaches, and dispels a common misconception: no, every individual bean does not have to be tracked to an exact origin.
Read those two things together and the position for soluble gets clearer. Pooling is not the problem. Pooling with anything unmapped is the problem.
Which means the route through is not lot-level segregation of every blend. That would wreck procurement flexibility in a category built on cost control. The route through is making the whole pool traceable, so whatever gets drawn is already evidenced. Bigger investment up front. Smaller one every year after. Mapped plots stay mapped.
The extra year is smaller than it looks
December 2027 sounds like eighteen months of slack. It isn’t, because this data cannot be collected on a calendar that suits compliance teams. Plot mapping, farmer registration and consent happen when field staff are already in front of farmers. That means the buying station, during harvest. So count harvests, not months.
Vietnamese robusta is picked once a year, broadly from October. Between now and the end of 2027 that gives two buying seasons. The second one is tight, because anything captured then still needs verifying before shipment. Two, not eighteen.
Where the cost lands by default
Nothing in the regulation obliges a European brand owner to pay for mapping smallholder plots in Vietnam or Indonesia. So cost lands where bargaining power is weakest. In soluble supply chains, that is the collector and farmer end.
Producers who cannot evidence their plots will rarely be told they are non-compliant. They will just notice that buyers with EU exposure stop calling. Buyers serving other markets keep calling, and pay less. Beans that are entirely legal become beans nobody can prove are legal. Commercially, that is the same thing.
There is a version of this transition where mapping investment reaches the smallholders who need it. And a version where EU-facing soluble supply quietly consolidates onto a smaller set of well-documented estates and cooperatives. The second one requires nobody to decide anything. It is the default.
The question worth asking now
Green coffee has had years of attention on provenance, and the sector has made real progress. Soluble has had very little, on the reasonable assumption that it sat outside scope. That assumption expired on 13 July.
The useful question is not whether December 2027 is achievable. It is narrower. For the blends you will be selling into the EU eighteen months from now, do you know which farms they will draw on? And is anyone mapping them this harvest? If the answer is a list of countries, there are two harvests left to change it.
Sources
- European Commission, Commission updates product scope and tools to support EUDR, 13 July 2026
- European Commission, Regulation on Deforestation-free products (guidance and FAQ)
- Linklaters, Commission adopts Delegated Act on product scope and Implementing Act on the Information System
- ISEAL Alliance, Deforestation-free supply chains: the role of declaration in excess
- World Coffee Research, Vietnam country profile
- UNEP, Coffee, environmental degradation and smallholder livelihoods
- Indonesia Investments, Coffee Industry in Indonesia (BPS classification data)
Farmforce provides digital solutions for managing the first mile of agricultural supply chains, from farmer registration and GPS plot mapping to harvest purchasing, deforestation monitoring, and EUDR compliance. To see how Farmforce can support your traceability and sourcing operations, request a demo.
